Across the globe, countries like England, Germany, Australia, the USA, and South Africa are grappling with complex challenges surrounding immigration, integration, and societal cohesion.
Mzwanele Manyi’s September 29, 2025, constitutional amendment proposal, tabled as a private member's bill in the National Assembly, seeks to radically overhaul South Africa’s land tenure system. By declaring all land and natural resources as "national heritage" under state guardianship, it would effectively nationalize property, eliminate compensation for expropriations, and involve traditional and Khoi-San leaders in allocation decisions. The cut-off for land claims would retroactively shift from 1913 (Natives Land Act) to April 6, 1652 (Jan van Riebeeck's arrival), potentially reopening vast historical restitution claims. As a MK Party MP and former chief whip, Manyi frames this as restorative justice, aligning with the party's radical economic transformation agenda.
Land reform has been a flashpoint since 1994, with the ANC's initial restitution process (1994-2018) settling 80,000 claims but leaving 9,000 unresolved due to a 2018 cutoff extension. The 2024 Expropriation Act allows nil compensation in "just and equitable" cases, sparking global investor flight fears. Manyi's bill echoes EFF leader Julius Malema's calls for full nationalization, but lacks the EFF's parliamentary clout. MK Party's Role: Formed in 2023 by Jacob Zuma loyalists, MK holds 58 seats (up from 44 in 2024 by-elections), making it a GNU kingmaker. Manyi, a Zuma-era communications head, uses the proposal to rally populist support, amid MK's internal turmoil (e.g., Zuma's expulsion threats).
Equitable Access to Land Bill: Boshoff's warning targets this departmental draft, presented twice in 2025 to the Portfolio Committee on Land Reform. It proposes district-level "fair" farm sizes, labeling "excess" holdings as "bottlenecks" for expropriation without compensation to accelerate demographic alignment (aiming for 87% black ownership from 72%). The bill awaits Cabinet approval and public consultation, potentially by Q1 2026. Agbiz estimates 100,000 job losses if investor confidence erodes further; the DA and VF Plus vow opposition, citing food security risks (agriculture = 2.5% GDP). Internationally, the U.S. (via AGOA threats) and EU have flagged SA's policies as property rights violations, with $8.5 billion in UAE trade (2024) as a diversification hedge. SA's farmland is 79.4 million ha, with 72% black-owned (2023 AgriSA stats); restitution claims backlog costs R100 billion annually.
Manyi’s bill is theatrical populism—unlikely to pass without a two-thirds majority (ANC + MK = ~230 seats, needing 267)—designed to energize MK's base amid Zuma's influence. It distracts from the Equitable Access Bill's stealthier threat: codifying "fair sizes" could trigger mass expropriations, prioritizing symbolism over viability. Boshoff rightly flags this as the real danger, echoing critics like Agbiz's Wandile Sihlobo, who warns of investor exodus and 32.9% unemployment spikes.Economically, it's a disaster waiting: agriculture employs 850,000 directly, contributing R200 billion in exports (2023). Nil compensation erodes property rights, deterring FDI (down 20% in 2024) and risking food inflation (4.5% now). Politically, it fuels division, alienating GNU partners like the DA while courting EFF radicals. For marginalized communities, it promises equity but delivers uncertainty—restitution delays (9,000 claims) show state inefficiency.The path forward? Transparent, compensated reform with market safeguards, as in Brazil's FMD eradication (boosting exports 34% in 2025). SA needs unity, not division, to balance justice and growth. VF Plus's opposition is a start, but broader coalitions—farmers, investors, and civil society—must demand evidence-based policy. Otherwise, Manyi’s "heritage" rhetoric risks turning fertile land into fallow fields.
Manyi’s bill is theatrical populism—unlikely to pass without a two-thirds majority (ANC + MK = ~230 seats, needing 267)—designed to energize MK's base amid Zuma's influence. It distracts from the Equitable Access Bill's stealthier threat: codifying "fair sizes" could trigger mass expropriations, prioritizing symbolism over viability.
The path forward? Transparent, compensated reform with market safeguards, as in Brazil's FMD eradication (boosting exports 34% in 2025). SA needs unity, not division, to balance justice and growth. VF Plus's opposition is a start, but broader coalitions—farmers, investors, and civil society—must demand evidence-based policy. Otherwise, Manyi’s "heritage" rhetoric risks turning fertile land into fallow fields.
Want to join our popular weekly viewpoint? Contact us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.! You can make your own Viewpoint. - Our Professional civilized approach to your option is respected.
DISCLAIMER
The views and opinions expressed in this program are those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect the views or positions of any entities they represent. The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. The information is provided by CRA and while we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
