South Africa’s Ambassador to the United States, Roelf Meyer, has confirmed that Pretoria remains committed to dialogue with Washington even after the Trump administration imposed new visa restrictions on certain South African policymakers.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced the measures this week, targeting foreign nationals deemed responsible for or complicit in policies that promote race-based discrimination, enable expropriation without compensation, or incite imminent violence against racial or ethnic minorities, including Afrikaners. The restrictions can also extend to the immediate family members of those affected.Meyer, who was appointed by President Cyril Ramaphosa in April 2026 to replace the previously expelled Ebrahim Rasool, told News24 that South Africa takes note of Rubio’s announcement but wants to keep engaging.
“We take note of what Secretary of State Rubio said, but we would like to continue engaging, and that is what we believe the task is,” he said. He stressed that Pretoria prefers de-escalation regardless of the tone coming from Washington.The ambassador’s comments came shortly after both Rubio and US Ambassador to South Africa Leo Brent Bozell adopted a markedly harder line. Bozell warned on social media that the visa restrictions were “only a first step” and that the time for endless dialogue had run its course. “America has just so much patience,” he wrote, adding that further severe consequences would follow if South Africa failed to address outstanding US concerns. He claimed Pretoria had so far shown little interest in maintaining strong bilateral relations.The visa restrictions did not arrive without warning. In March 2026, Bozell formally listed five demands that mirrored requests first conveyed to South African delegations in June 2025.
US tariffs 2025: 31% blow to South African exports
These included protecting rural communities from farm attacks, publicly condemning hate speech such as the chant “Kill the Boer,” ensuring fair compensation standards in expropriation legislation, scrapping mandatory ownership transfers under Black Economic Empowerment rules, and ending South Africa’s diplomatic association with Iran. Bozell described the requests as “achievable, practical and beneficial to both Americans and South Africans,” but said Pretoria had left Washington without a substantive response for more than a year.South Africa’s Department of International Relations and Cooperation responded with concern. Minister Ronald Lamola accused unspecified fringe groups of misrepresenting the country’s domestic policies to American authorities. He defended post-apartheid legislation on land and racial equity as a constitutional obligation to address historical injustices rather than an act of discrimination.
“It is our sovereign right to enact legislation that addresses the consequences of centuries of racial injustice,” the department stated, adding that differences of view should be resolved through South Africa’s own democratic institutions and processes, not external pressure.AfriForum welcomed the US action. CEO Kallie Kriel said the organisation was relieved that the measures targeted specific individuals rather than South Africa or its people as a whole. He placed full responsibility on the South African government for failing to act against the chanting of “Kill the Boer,” the Expropriation Act, and what AfriForum describes as race-based discriminatory policies. The civil rights group noted that it had previously compiled dossiers calling for international action against figures such as EFF leader Julius Malema over the use of the slogan.The latest developments add further strain to already tense relations between Pretoria and Washington. While Meyer continues to advocate for engagement, the US has made clear that patience is wearing thin and that additional measures remain on the table if its concerns are not addressed.
