South Africa's state-owned enterprises (SOEs) have indeed faced significant decline over the 30+ years of ANC governance since 1994, largely attributed to widespread corruption, cadre deployment placing incompetent or politically connected individuals in key roles, mismanagement, and lack of accountability, resulting in massive financial losses (e.g., R172 billion over five years through early 2026) and operational failures across entities like Eskom, Transnet, and Prasa. Experts and reports, including the Zondo Commission, highlight how these issues eroded infrastructure, led to repeated bailouts (totaling hundreds of billions), and contributed to economic stagnation, with SOEs becoming symbols of state capture and inefficiency rather than drivers of development.
Public sentiment, as seen in recent social media discussions, remains highly critical, accusing the ANC of destroying vital companies through corruption and incompetence, with some viewing it as enabling a "mafia state" via dismantled institutions. Key entities like Eskom, Transnet, and Prasa became emblematic of state capture, as detailed in the Zondo Commission (2018–2022), which exposed how procurement manipulation, political interference, and networks of influence redirected public resources for private gain, contributing to economic stagnation and public distrust. Public sentiment, reflected in ongoing social media and commentary, remains sharply critical, often accusing the ANC of deliberately destroying these vital institutions through corruption and incompetence, with some describing it as fostering a "mafia state" by dismantling effective governance.
Public opinion, especially on social media, remains sharply critical, blaming the ANC for destroying these vital institutions through corruption and incompetence, with many describing it as creating a "mafia state" by weakening governance structures. While some turnaround progress has started under the post-2024 GNU (e.g., Eskom's first profit in years and Transnet narrowing losses), deep-rooted issues like persistent corruption perceptions and slow accountability mean SOEs continue to pose fiscal risks and hinder growth without sustained reforms.
Recent regulatory reforms in South Africa’s freight rail sector, including Transnet’s network statement enabling open access and the allocation of train operating company (TOC) slots to private operators, are boosting investor confidence by unlocking opportunities, though some regulatory clarity is still needed. Last year, Transnet’s rail infrastructure manager granted 11 new TOCs access to 41 routes across six strategic corridors, supporting the government’s target of 250 million tons of rail freight by 2029. This policy certainty spurred a landmark R3.4 billion private investment by Traxtion in locomotives and wagons—the largest such private freight rail commitment in South African history—focused on modernising rolling stock, creating jobs, and addressing capacity shortfalls.Three high-impact corridors stand out for refurbishment and modernisation:
- North Corridor — carries over 50% of total freight volumes, mainly coal to Eskom power stations and export terminals like Richards Bay, but faces ageing infrastructure, signalling issues, and capacity constraints.
- Container Corridor (Gauteng to KwaZulu-Natal) — the backbone linking inland areas to the Port of Durban; bottlenecks currently force 80% of containers onto the N3 highway, hurting manufacturing, retail, and trade flows.
- Cape Corridor — connects Northern Cape manganese mines and Western Cape fruit exporters to ports like Cape Town, Ngqura, and East London; modernisation (e.g., signalling upgrades) could double capacity via private operators without full state rebuilds.
BACKGROUND of the EXCELLENT RAILWAY SERVICE-
South Africa's railway network under South African Railways (SAR) and later South African Transport Services (SATS) was much more extensive and heavily used for passenger services, including in rural and countryside areas.During that era:
- The network covered around 22,000–23,000 km of track at its peak (compared to about 20,000 km today, with many lines now inactive or freight-only).
- Branch lines and secondary routes connected small towns, farming communities, and rural areas across provinces like the Eastern Cape, Free State, Limpopo, and KwaZulu-Natal.
- Mixed trains (passenger + goods) ran regularly on these lines, often daily or several times a week, carrying people, mail, livestock, produce, and general freight.
- Services like unadvertised "accommodation" trains on pick-up/goods trains allowed rural passengers to travel affordably, and some lines (e.g., in the Langkloof, Patensie branch, or Eastern Cape branches) supported communities without good road access.
- Many people recall the trains as reliable for their time—often on schedule or with predictable delays—because the system was well-maintained, steam and early diesel/electric traction were dominant, and there was less competition from roads before full deregulation.
- Gradual road deregulation (from the late 1970s) making buses and trucks cheaper/faster for many routes.
- Shift to business-focused operations under Transnet (1990 onward), prioritising profitable freight over passenger services.
- Underinvestment in maintenance, especially on branch lines.
- Rising competition from minibus taxis and private cars.
- Vandalism, theft, and operational issues in the 1990s–2000s, leading to service cuts and closures of many rural lines.
Want to join our popular weekly viewpoint? Contact us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.! You can make your own Viewpoint. - Our Professional civilized approach to your option is respected.
Every week, our flagship Viewpoint article is now shared with 33 international media houses across continents. These partners translate and publish the content in 12 international languages, putting South Africa's farming stories, challenges and triumphs in front of thousands of readers worldwide.
DISCLAIMER
The views and opinions expressed in this program are those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect the views or positions of any entities they represent. The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. The information is provided by CRA and while we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
